The U.S. House and Senate will vote on a compromise $790 billion stimulus package that includes subsidies for 65% of the COBRA health insurance premiums paid by laid-off workers, under a hard-fought conference report unveiled late Feb. 12.
The final version of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which followed intense negotiations between leaders of the two chambers, is smaller than either the $819 billion stimulus passed by the House or the $838 billion package cleared by the Senate. Completion of the conference report for H.R. 1 sets up a planned Feb. 13 House vote, with the Senate to move the package either later in the day or over the President’s Day weekend. Following the vote, Congress will stand in recess until Feb. 23.
The final COBRA provisions, which were welcomed by the health insurance industry, are more generous than the 50% subsidy in the Senate version, but do not last as long as the 12-month subsidy included in both prior versions of the bill. Estimated to cost $24.7 billion, the provision would provide aid to an estimated 7 million involuntarily terminated between Sept. 1, 2008 and Dec. 31, 2009 to pay continue paying health insurance premiums through the 23-year-old Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act program.
COBRA allows employees who are terminated or leave their jobs voluntarily to remain in their former employer’s group health plan for up to 18 months, which can be extended to 36 months for those with extenuating life circumstances. Employers are permitted to charge COBRA enrollees up to 102% of the true cost of group health premiums, which average more than $1,000 per month.
According to the final report, the aid would be available for up to nine months, or until the terminated worker receives an offer of any new employer-sponsored health care coverage or becomes eligible for Medicare. Subsidies would not be available to those who earn more than $125,000 a year, or $250,000 per household.
The final version also strips out a provision opposed by the National Business Group on Health, which represents large employers, that would have allowed beneficiaries older than age 55 and those who have worked for the same employer for a decade to retain COBRA coverage until they become eligible for Medicare.
The measure also includes $17.2 billion in funding for health information technology infrastructure and an additional $2 billion in affiliated grants and loans. The bill sets a goal of seeing 90% of doctors and 70% of hospitals adopt electronic health records within the next decade, but it couples that with more stringent regulations on the transmission of identifiable health information. Insurers have protested that the bill’s notification requirements for security breaches were broadly worded, that it authorizing state attorneys general to enforce federal privacy standards and that new regulations could restrict health promotion, disease management and care coordination programs.
However, groups such as the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and America’s Health Insurance Plans welcomed $1.1 billion in new funding for comparative effectiveness research. The BCBSA has proposed creation of an industry-funded institute to offer recommendations on the most effective and cost-efficient medical treatments.
“With comparative effectiveness, patients and providers will be able to assess drugs, technologies, and treatment options and make decisions that best reflect the patients’ needs and preferences,” AHIP President Karen Ignagni said in a statement. “We applaud efforts to address this important priority in the current economic recovery bills.”
The final package mostly eliminates a $54 billion provision, seen as potentially beneficial particularly to financial guaranty and mortgage guaranty insurers, that would have allowed corporations to carry back net operating losses for 2008 and 2009 against taxes paid in the prior five years. The final version offers a much more limited, $947 million carryback open only to businesses with gross receipts of less than $15 million, which could potentially be helpful to some agencies and small carriers.
Other small business tax provisions of potential benefit to agencies include $41 million to allow a one-time write-off of up to $125,000 in capital expenses; $829 million for raising the small business stock sale capital gains exclusion to 75% from 50%; and $415 million to temporarily reduce the built-in gains holding period for S corporations from 10 years to seven years.
Having been laid off on July 23rd, 2008, am I eligible for a 65% decrease in my cobra payments? Retroactive to September 1?
My former employer, International Contractors, Inc. and their CFO, insist that because I was laid off prior to September 1, 2008, I am not eligible for a rebate nor a 65% lessened rate on the $381 I am paying them each month. I can’t believe that the stimulus package would not apply to those of us who were laid off prior to September 1. What is to happen to us and why would we be ignored? We are the ones who are in the most trouble.
This is an email to me today when I inquired: Bobbie, This is from the new law: “the provision would provide aid to an estimated 7 million involuntarily terminated between Sept. 1, 2008 and Dec. 31, 2009 to pay continue paying health insurance premiums through the 23-year-old Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act program.”
If, indeed, we are not going to benefit from the stimulus package, what is my recourse? This seems totally unfair.
I worked for a small- under 20 employees- manufacturer who let me go on January 23rd for lack of substantial sales. COBRA doesn’t apply for my situation, but Illinois has a continuation program that I could have taken, but couldn’t afford. Please talk about that. Will the stimulus package apply to those people that are in my same situation? Thank you.
Having been laid off on July 23rd, 2008, am I eligible for a 65% decrease in my cobra payments? Retroactive to September 1?
My former employer, International Contractors, Inc. and their CFO, insist that because I was laid off prior to September 1, 2008, I am not eligible for a rebate nor a 65% lessened rate on the $381 I am paying them each month. I can’t believe that the stimulus package would not apply to those of us who were laid off prior to September 1. What is to happen to us and why would we be ignored? We are the ones who are in the most trouble.
This is an email to me today when I inquired: Bobbie, This is from the new law: "the provision would provide aid to an estimated 7 million involuntarily terminated between Sept. 1, 2008 and Dec. 31, 2009 to pay continue paying health insurance premiums through the 23-year-old Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act program."
If, indeed, we are not going to benefit from the stimulus package, what is my recourse? This seems totally unfair.
I worked for a small- under 20 employees- manufacturer who let me go on January 23rd for lack of substantial sales. COBRA doesn't apply for my situation, but Illinois has a continuation program that I could have taken, but couldn't afford. Please talk about that. Will the stimulus package apply to those people that are in my same situation? Thank you.